Labour Plot to Silence Nigel Farage

by | Sep 14, 2024 | Latest News | 0 comments

Paid Media for MPs like Farage Could be Banned

Nigel Farage could be banned from hosting his GB News show under a Labour Crackdown on MPs making paid media appearances. Parliament’s modernization committee yeah, a real thing which is being chaired by Labour front bencher Lucy Powell today published a memorandum agreeing to look at tightening rules on second jobs but is this move actually a chilling attack on free speech and crucially as well GB News I’m joined Now by Reform UK’s immigration and Justice spokesperson Ann Widdecombe, Ann thank you very much, now l think that they’ve got a tricky time getting at us through Ofcom and all of this stuff but actually if they can just knock Nigel Farage out of play by doing something like this then why wouldn’t they do it?

Well, indeed and I think if you look at the whole argument around MP second jobs you know you have to make so many exceptions at the end of it what you’re really doing is choosing who you’re going to prevent from doing second jobs and that seems to be what’s happening here. They’ve said right well you know it’ll be people with paid media appearances, but where are you going to stop, I mean supposing you’ve got somebody who’s come from the media who’s still got a profession there who wants to make say a documentary, I mean, never mind present a program, just wants to make a documentary.

I did plenty of those while I was an MP and it didn’t interfere with anything that I was doing as an MP and nobody thought it was peculiar, the only reason they would want to do this as far as I can tell is if there was someone with a prominent platform that they didn’t like who they thought that they could significantly inconvenience and I look around, David Lammy doesn’t do his LBC show any more you know, Ed Balls is a retired Labour politician now, despite of course being married to our home secretary so actually really the only person this affects is Nigel Farage, well certainly the only person it affects in terms of you know an ongoing regular appearance, but what are they going to do about people who do one-offs?

How To Silence Nigel Farage

As I’ve just said you know, are they going to include them as well and if not what possible grounds can they have for excluding Nigel? So, conceivably what could happen is that the Labour party every single day the government gets the opportunity to put a minister up for a morning round, they also could maybe decide which ones of their Labour politicians were allowed to do columns in newspapers for example, but if another MP from another party (Farage for example) wanted to be paid to write a newspaper column or do a television show that would be banned and I think that’s quite shocking from a freedom of speech point of view.

Well, they’ve got to decide exactly what they’re going to ban, are they going to ban you know one off articles in newspapers on subjects of expertise are they just going to do a blanket ban on anything to do whatever with the press and media? What are they going to do they haven’t actually told us Patrick?

We don’t know, there is an argument though and some people really do fully subscribe to this argument that if you are elected to be an MP for a particular constituency then your entire sole focus should singularly be on that, i.e. just to continue with this with Nigel Farage as the example, that the fair people of Clacton might benefit more if Nigel Farage spent all his time there focusing on them.

I can’t imagine anything worse than a parliament full of people who have no connection with the outside world beyond the job that they actually do, I can’t imagine anything worse and then of course you start on the exceptions, you know, you’ve got the doctors, the dentists, well they can’t stop practicing, after you know 10 years would you want your teeth pulled by somebody who hadn’t done it for 10 years? And so the exceptions start, as they always have and then as I say if you have enough exceptions then you come down with people you’re discriminating against, like Farage.

The Plot: Nadine Dorries Amazon Ad

A Possible Ban will have Exceptions

Do you think that if this did become law Nigel Farage would just break the law? Well of course Parliament can impose its own penalties on MPs who do that, I don’t know what he would do, you’ve got to ask him that, but I think the best solution to this is to resist it becoming law.

You raise an interesting question there, it ties in with, it’s the second jobs issue when it comes to MPs and I have my own theories about why Labour might want to climb down on this and I will just say it, which is that if you have some somebody who is desperate to work in the private sector and go and make a bit of money in the city or set up their own business or do all of this stuff that would therefore essentially excluded them from going into politics, so you might end up with the kind of people who are not particularly inspired by any of those things and I do not want to generalize overly here but I suspect most of those kind of people would lean towards the left and therefore you could stack the deck with a load of lefties.

You could certainly have a very second-rate Parliament if you’ve got people who can’t carry on with paid interests in which you know they have a legitimate, not only legitimate interest but from which they can bring expertise into the House of Commons, it’s why do so many barristers in the house of common practice? The answer is because if they didn’t they wouldn’t be capable of doing it in a few years’ time, what could the possible justification for this be though?

Second Jobs for MPs

You know let’s have a look so they would say well, we want to spend more time with your constituents who want it to be the sole focus, they could say that it might get rid of vested interests, they could say in the case of Nigel Farage here on GB News presenting a show Monday to Thursday or back you know prior to Jacob Rees Mogg well I suppose is the case against that isn’t he, because he lost his seat but you know that Nigel Farage can use that platform to self-promote and therefore politically promote and that that is in some way unfair okay, then so you get an MP who writes bestsellers do you forbid that as well because you know if somebody is in the public eye because of that, you know are you going to forbid that.

There are just so many as I say, in the end you’ve got to end up making a whole raft of exceptions and therefore you end up with a small persecuted minority if you want to put it that way. The cynic in me would say that Labour might have weighed this up. I’ve got no doubt they would deny this that Labour might have weighed this up and thought it might be a bit too tricky to come after Farage through the means of Ofcom and get us taken off air or anything like that, but if they can knock out a big hitter like Farage at GB News by doing something like this then maybe, maybe they would do that of course.

I’m sure that’s featured in the discussion, well of course there is no suggestion of that at the moment I wouldn’t want to, I’m not saying that that’s their motive but I’m saying, I’m sure it’s featured in discussions. I do wonder, one wonders don’t they and thank you very much Ann Widdecombe there who is Reform UK’s immigration and Justice spokesperson, great to have you in the studio thank you very much.

Donate to Reform Nation - Join the Fight

Khan: Prisoners to Get Social Housing Priority

London mayor Sadiq Khan has once again sparked outrage after he said that newly released prisoners should be prioritized for social housing so on Tuesday more than 1,600 violent criminals sex offenders Etc. will just be let loose onto Britain’s streets under the government’s early release scheme and speaking to the Times’s crime and Justice Commission yesterday Khan said we need to have an honest conversation with our constituents about the reasons why people who have come out of prison may need to jump in the queue to get housing to avoid them reoffending again.

Well, those comments were slammed by to leadership front runner Robert Jenrick who earlier today accused Labour of putting decent people last, well there we go. I’m joined now by former Labour adviser Matthew Torbitt, Matthew great to have you on the show thank you very much for making the time for us this evening.

Is he right then Robert Jenrick, they’re putting decent people last, putting a criminal up the housing waiting list? I don’t know, I mean it wouldn’t be like there’s a leadership competition on its all for Robert Jenrick to be diving in on something Sadiq Khan said but I think I don’t know that the framing of the question suggests that people that end up in prison can’t always be decent people. Many people in life make mistakes, some much bigger than others and again you know you alluded to it in your introduction, I would reserve judgment for things like sex offenders, paedophiles and other things but for those that sometimes-initiate crimes of potentially poverty or for want of other reasons.

Commit a Crime & Jump the Housing Queue

I wouldn’t necessarily say that people have been to prison aren’t decent, yeah, I do appreciate that look I do. I do appreciate what you’re saying there what I would say though is well, what message does this send out to anyone who just abides by the law so people who might have gone shoplifting when they were hungry but didn’t and have waited on the housing waiting list then all of a sudden the London Mayor says, I’m really sorry but this blow with you know even if it’s petty crime but convictions as long as your arm does go above you in the housing waiting list it feels a bit like the social contract would be broken there?

Well, I would agree the social contract for me feels broken in that you know me and you probably always were brought up in that if you work hard and you abide by the law and you get on in life you know you’ll be able to afford a home and have sort of quite a nice life it doesn’t seem to be the case I think with regards to prioritizing.

I think what Sadiq said is we need to have a conversation I think that’s fair enough in many ways I think the other thing is there are many, the evidence is there that if people that leave prison are found relatively permanent housing they don’t go on to reoffend and reoffending costs us all through the home office £20 billion a year, so I think there’s an economic argument to show that certain people should be prioritized but that can depend obviously, you can have prisoners that are of old age that are potentially mentally ill or have learning difficulties, physical disabilities or maybe fleeing violence or persecution as such for whatever they’ve been involved in and I think you know how you prioritize those and for those that are already on the waiting list is a tricky thing.

Population Explosion Causing Bad Decision Making to Multiply

I think the main thing is we need to be building more housing yeah, we do need to be building more housing, I just think it plays into the perception that in Britain very often it seems to be law abiding Brits who are the back of the queue for everything but on the flip side of that if we we’ve got to ask ourselves how do we wish to treat prisoners once all is said and done.

If you have broken the law you’ve ended up in prison you’ve done the punishment you’ve been in prison for maybe five or ten, however many years, you’ve got a criminal record that could last up to 10 years maybe longer, you’re going to find it hard to get on in life and you know it’s right that people are punished.

I’m not saying you know people shouldn’t be going to prison for certain things but ultimately when is enough, enough? Once you’ve done the crime and you’ve done the time, surely, we have to ask ourselves. I would hate, I would hate for a situation to occur where the one of the victims of those crimes gets bumped down a social housing waiting list for the for the man or woman who did commit that crime against them though and I’m not quite sure how, I’m just not quite sure why Sadiq Khan says this stuff, like is he trolling us.

Do you think, I think it’s popular to dislike Sadiq Khan he does say some things at times where I think well I would certainly, wouldn’t have advised that but I think I don’t know, he’s opening up a question actually, politicians may not have the courage to even entertain the idea that you know economically is causing chaos.

Donate to Reform Nation - Join the Fight

Two Tier Law & Order

The fact that we are even more recently in the more recent riots we’ve got people going to prison that really probably maybe shouldn’t be going to prison for saying things online and whether that, whether we’re too harsh with our conviction sometimes Keir Starmer has a record of that previously with the 2011 riots when he was head of the DPP so it also opens up the argument of whether we’re sending people to prison far too easily which you know the current Minister would agree. He seems to think two-thirds of people shouldn’t be there at all, I do worry right, so there’s a lot spoken about especially by the likes of Sadiq Khan and Keir when it comes to language’s importance in policy.

Language really matters, language really matters in life okay all right I get that but you know we’ve had Sadiq Khan who relentlessly seems to be calling out things as racist you know, if you’re against what’s going on in the channel and you might be a racist and all of this, if you’re against all the pro Palestine stuff you know you might be a racist, you might be a member of the far right and a lot of that stuff for me comes from things that actually people have got a legitimate right to be angry about.

Well now if you’re angry about the idea that someone who’s you know either battered someone in the street or done some crime and gone to prison for it skips the housing waiting list now are we being told that we’re unkind. I can see your point, I don’t think you’re unkind but I think we maybe need to look through the other end of the telescope and actually ask ourselves what do we want? Do we want a society that that gives people second chances or do we cast aside people for the rest of their lives which ultimately the victim of a crime may not want because it may cause another victim of a crime because somebody has felt they need to go and reoffend further because they’ve not been allowed to get on with their life post prison yeah. No look hey, we, I think we can have a perfectly respectable conversation about this as indeed we just have Matthew massively appreciate your time this evening you take care all right, Matthew Torbitt with their former Labour adviser.

I’m not sure that’s a ratio I would like, now before we speak to Benedict Spence about the state of the nation, let’s refresh ourselves because this is what I call Keir Starmer’s greatest hits. Let’s kick off, first of all with what he said before he sacked Sue Gray.

I just want to clarify her position as apparently, it’s been causing divisions, can you obviously carry on with it? Yeah, that’s complete nonsense, so I hope that’s clear enough. That’s complete nonsense absolutely no divisions being caused by Sue Gray. Why have you finally then, I can’t, let’s move on because still he has got something more to say about cronyism. Let’s move on because still he’s got something more to say about it. We will restore standards in public life with a total crackdown on Judaism.

Seriously politicians think they can carry on like this or my, what they can forget how do you fancy £32,000 for some suits and some glasses yeah right then. Next one here’s Starmer on the rules. It very important to me that the rules are followed, I’ve always said that I said before. It’s very important to me that the rules are followed, I’ve always said that I said that before the election I’ve reinforced it after the election. This is too good isn’t it I mean you can’t write this stuff.

This is actually genuinely, absolutely what he said here’s what he said on your line of third before you prepare the issue party for government.

We have prepared all about apartments for government if we are privileged to come in to serve our country it will be public service, for me as it always has been not self-entitlement. Public service not self-entitlement. Really, we’ll be the judge of that and finally the P.A. is to this dance on a very serious matter, I’m afraid he managed to make this blunder. So, I call again for restraint and de-escalation of all between Lebanon and Israel. Again, all parties to pull back from the wing. I call again for the media, a ceasefire in Gaza, the return of the sausages, the hostages.

I just can’t explain that, I mean it’s, we’re going to, people all week about this and nobody but nobody can explain how you mistake the word hostages for sausages. I mean it’s got so bad I was out last night having some dinner and they served up a rather nice pasta with some Tuscan sausage in it and we all talking about you know pasta with hostages. We’re all talking about you know pasta hostages. That’s what we do.

Benedict Spencer is here very good morning to you Benedict. Good morning, Mike, I’m very well I mean It’s hard to keep a straight face and watching all that but it’s quite actually pathetic, is it not that we are about to reach the first 100 days of this new Labour government and that’s the kind of shambles that we’re having to encounter on a daily basis.

Well not only a hundred days of the new Labour government but as we were so reliably informed a hundred days of the grown-ups not being back in charge. It’s been, it is delicious actually in many ways that so many it has been, it is delicious actually in many ways that so many people the day after that election said don’t worry everything’s going to be fine, we’ve got a sensible government full of people who are serious on policy and have your best interests at heart and it frankly has been even more laughable than the last hundred days of the Tories here being to be honest.

Well, it is and that yeah, that staggers me so much that the bare face lies, the hypocrisy, I mean some of those quotes, we’re sharing some of those clips that we’re showing where he’s clearly demented isn’t he? I mean when he says this is not going to be a government of self-entitlement, this is going to be a government of integrity. This is going to be a government of service, I mean who do you think he is kidding? I mean he’s carpet-bombing what reputation, what actual respect the Labour Party had. I mean we do have to remember they won a large majority not because people like them but because they weren’t the Tories, so actually as much as people they might say that they were offering something different that the people bought, but I still think there was a lot of scepticism about how good it is from bench work but yeah they’ve just taken it to lengths that I didn’t really think were possible in terms of you know the gifts and the freebies and the double standards and the two facedness and even the explanations you know.

People like Angela Rayner coming out in the midst of all this going well everybody does this, it’s perfectly fine you know basically setting out their stall, why the Tories were bad and they got away with it so we can do the same, as if that’s how this works. As if that’s how popularity works is that how legitimacy works and as if her prime minister then doesn’t very regularly go on television saying we will do the exact opposite of these things, then it turns out we’re still doing well, this is the problem you know because no matter how much he might want it all to go away, he seems to be forgetting that unfortunately the media in this country are still relatively free and suddenly shuts it all down and manages to sort of stop us all from saying things that he doesn’t like. 

Boris Unleashed Memoir, buy the book

But, you know this whole you know, please go, you know trouser gate Lord Alli being in person and be investigated by the House of Lords now being looked up by the police you know, in case the Keir Starmer’s also now being looked at by the police in case he misreported where he was living, I mean it’s just, he can’t shake it off the, I mean you will see I mean they’ve tried actually, they’ve tried to say always the right wing press is that you know it’s all of that sort of thing but nobody’s buying that particular I mean what’s most telling is that even the Guardian and the Observer are now very frequently running pages that discuss not perhaps so much things like you know the freebies or anything like that but a very frequently running stories about Rachel Reeves tax plans and how actually they’re probably aren’t very good and are not going to work.

If you’ve already got the Guardian going in two footed on Labour policy saying hang on guys this might not be very good for the economy, I mean that I think tells you everything you need to know about how well Labour have started and I think people were prepared to give them a grace period, that’s the irony. You know in the first sort of three or four days people were out there going well this government will need time to bed in and undo a lot of the problems that the Tories have left them with, but they shot themselves in the foot and I don’t even just mean with things like the sleaze allegations but actually starting off your time in government by saying we have too many people in prison and so we’re going to be letting out people before they finish their sentences.

What were they expecting things to happen? You can’t tempt fate like that and think oh yes everything will be fine just because we say we’re grown up right and you also said when he was asked before that happened if it could be absolutely sure that nobody would reoffend, nobody would be in danger and when he managed to get that wrong as well but it was very indignant of being asked the question as we saw from the one about Sue Gray, you know is she being divisive behind the scenes?

No absolute, long since, I am clear on that, and he gets very touchy and he tells the obvious Miss Truths, he must know he’s lying because he knows that she is being divisive because you know two weeks later we yeah, I mean that whole thing and the telling what the effort they went to get her in the first place right and controversy that it caused, because it did cause controversy, to get sort of a very senior civil servant to then come on board and take a political role once she’d been involved in a role that was meant to be very impartial and of course it was involved in the defenestration of Boris Johnson with that investigation to sort of go to that lengths to bring this person in and say well we’re prepared to take that risk, but she’s a real straight talker, she knows how everything works and why she’s going to make it work and then again, keep on staying with her until your chief of staff is out of the door then replaced I mean again what does that say about his judgement of course and the story doesn’t end there because you know we were sort of all led to believe by the sort of spin doctors in Downing St, frankly they were not very good at.

This was a bit of a battle between Harry Morgan and McSweeney, now it’s all over she is going to go do the job as the Envoys for Nations and Regions, it’s all going to be lovely well apparently not because she’s still briefing against the government, she’s still briefing against McSweeney who she clearly hates and she’s now angling for a big massive payoff from the job that she was fired from because she was no bleeding good at it.

I’ve got to be honest so I kind of think from her perspective well why not, you’ve you know you have torpedoed your own reputation as an impartial civil servant to come and work for Two Tier Keir yeah and he clearly has no handle on his own operation.

Donate to Reform Nation - Join the Fight

He’s already allowed a power struggle within number 10 between her and McSweeney and you’d probably be feeling from her perspective well yeah, that’s my reputation gone, my future in the civil service gone, my service, my future in government you know in the administration of the country has gone and seeing is actually the Labour party throwing money around left right and centre on your freebies and redecorations and all the money for train drivers and this money for the special press group and that you’re probably sat there going well, why shouldn’t I have a piece of this?

Why I’m not the one that made this appointment I’m absolutely going to get my tuppence worth yeah and every story seems and not be able to be put away, I mean you can imagine in the old days whether you like it or not and I don’t like him, Alistair Campbell was pretty good at killing stories if he didn’t like them you know, by the same token previous kind of press secretaries in even John Majors time and Margaret Thatcher’s time were pretty good ending stories, but still we’re talking about the Taylor Swift motorcade.

Here’s Angela Rayner trying to justify what it was, an absolute operational decision by the police in the context of threats that the singer had heard of in Europe so it was a purely operational. I absolutely dispute that somehow this was in any way connected to whether somebody went to a concert or not, it was an operational matter for the police and it was about security in regards to the threats that were active across Europe to make sure that the singer was able to deliver those concerts which brought in a huge amounts of investment and money into our economy, including those small businesses that need that, but it was a policing matter, not an issue for politicians.

I don’t know the range of the rain it was briefed, not to mention that singer’s name Taylor Swift but you know is clear that something happened in that Cooper has not justified what she did. She’s never come out and said anything she completely failed to disclose the fact that you got free tickets through her husband Ed Balls you know and it shouldn’t be a story.

I don’t think it’s a massive story but it’s indicative is it not? Been a so very useless they are managing the news well that’s exactly the point and I think if Cooper is not one of the sorts of the new intake of Labour and people that has little experience a government, she actually is a very sort of wise old head supposedly who’s been put in into office. She should have known in her position as Home Secretary, look you may be at some stage called upon to intervene on behalf of certain individuals to do with security matters. It is not as if Taylor Swift was an unknown entity, you know that this is somebody who actually you can see the tour coming six months in advance because it’s so vast and actually she would have known that there would have been special security implications around that even before we had this territory yeah.

You’d have known that, so what is she and other MPs senior MPs ministers doing taking tickets for this sort of thing, because she should have known at some point there was a very high likelihood that somebody would have turned around and gone hang on, as you’re in charge of this person’s security aren’t you in some way compromised? Doesn’t it look a little bit odd you know that they’re trying to spin it, saying well they get the tickets from Ed Balls and that’s how she got them, but still, come on you can’t make that degree of operation to get away with it, no you can’t and also there are implications for other people who are going to come here now in the future, who are going to say any given sort of you know drop of the hat, there’s a bit of a death threat that we’ve been given so we better get a police motorcade.

According to the Sun this morning there were several trips each one of which cost £30,000 for the police to police and of course there’s a Prince Harry scenario, now where he may come back and say to the people who effectively won the court case over him, to say you don’t need this, you don’t deserve it, we’re not giving it. So, he’s now got perfect, I mean you know I’m no fan of Prince Harry but I can say he’s got the perfect right to go back to the police now and say well hang on you’re going to give it to Taylor Swift and I’ll give it as there is the latest death threat.

I agree with you, I think of suddenly we’re all saying thinking Prince Harry, it’s got a very justified point as a member of the royal family to say actually I should get at least some of what Taylor Swift is getting, but I mean equally you know if this is going to be the thing it’s going to become a marketing strategy actually the lots and lots of American celebrities are going to use maybe British ones as well they’re going to apply for this sort of thing, they’re going to expect it, they’re going to factor it into sort of the promotional stuff around their tour and the British taxpayer will be footing the bill for that all because actually of inexperience and frankly a breed on the part of British ministers it basically saying to anybody well look if you got a big enough profile you can have it you can have the state doing this whole sort of blue lights thing which, just on a sort of an operational level I would have thought would draw attention to the whereabouts of a particular end of it.

If you’re a terrorist who’s I don’t know willing to blow themselves up or be shot trying cause mayhem are you actually going to be put off by the sights of the blue lights no, you’re going to go towards the lights yeah?

You’re absolutely right I mean it’s not in any way necessarily a way to save you on somebody’s life but listen, graduates and talks you haven’t experienced thank you very much, I do we can talk all day because it’s so much more to so many more things to talk about this, from Nigel in Cambridge is “as the threat in Vienna was not to her, it was to her audience, not sure how a police escort for her personally would help a similar threat which the MET judge to be risk” Idiots yeah, I think that’s right, let’s get a voice note.

All the latest Reform UK News as it happens, straight to your inbox.... don't miss out, sign up today

0 Comments

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *